Sunday, January 31, 2010

Does Your Insurance Company Finance Abortion?


Dr. Robert Moffitt is stirring up the pot. Moffitt is now the director of the Center for Health Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation and he is asking Americans to find out whether their employer-based health plan finance abortion, artificial contraception and physician assisted suicide. Moffitt explains:
"Forty-six percent of workers today in employer-based health insurance finance abortion. I think this is critical. Many of you know people who consider themselves very good, solid citizens [and] who consider themselves pro-life. They go to church on Sunday; but on Monday morning, they finance abortion. They don't know they finance abortion, they do not conscientiously do it -- but they do do it. And they do it through private health insurance. They do it because the plan covers it."
Read more from OneNewsNow.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

New Crucified Rabbi Podcasts Now Up

There are now several podcasts up over at crucifiedrabbi.com

RIP Professor Ralph McInerny (1929-2010)

I had the pleasure of meeting Ralph McInerny only once. It was back in Washington DC in about 2007. My impression of him was that he was a kind and jovial man who also happened to be a philosophical genius.

McInerny was an esteemed philosopher and novelist (you probably remember the Father Dowling novels and TV series). He also became a public intellectual with a reputation for prudence.

Please say a prayer for him and read more about his wonderful life in a recent tribute written by Thomas Hibbs: Ralph McInerny (1929-2010)

HT: Andrew Preslar

Thursday, January 28, 2010

A Parody for the Feast of Saint Thomas Aquinas: Whether Spanking Children is Lawful

Warning: This is a parody by Taylor Marshall - it's not really written by Saint Thomas Aquinas.

In the last few years, there have been several spoof versions of scholastic arguments in the manner of Saint Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologiae. Here's another spoof:

Summa theologiae, Supplementum Supplementi q. 54

Article. 1 Whether spanking children is lawful.

Objection 1. It seems that spanking children is not lawful because the Apostle states, “Fathers, do not provoke your children, lest they become discouraged” (Col 3:21) and again, “Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Eph 6:4). Now physical injury is a provocation. Hence spanking children is not lawful.

Objection 2. Besides, the Psalmist sings, “thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me” (Ps 23:4). Now striking a child with the rod is not comforting. Hence, it is not lawful to spank a child.

Objection 3. Furthermore, God prevented Moses from entering the Promised Land because he angrily struck the rock of salvation with a rod (cf. Num 20:11). By this signification we learn that the rod denotes the species of anger that forfeits the divine promises on account of malice. Hence, it is not lawful to use the rod on children about which Christ spoke: “For to such belongs the kingdom of Heaven” (Mt 19:14) for in these words Christ speaks of a promise.

On the contrary, It is written: “He who spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him” (Prov 12:24) and again, “Folly is bound up in the heart of a child, but the rod of discipline drives it far from him” (Prov 22:15). Now the dutiful parent disciplines his child and drives away folly. Therefore, it is lawful to spank a child with the rod.

I answer that, striking a child may be accomplished in two ways. A parent may spank a child in wrath so as to injure the child, or a parent may spank a child in a spirit of charity and patience so as to fulfill the words: “he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.” Consequently, spankings administered in charity are virtuous and meritorious.

Reply to the First Objection. Here the Apostle speaks of wrathful provocation whereby the child is wounded. Now the correction of vice in a child is not a wound, but a cure. Hence, the Apostle does not denounce corporeal punishments.

Reply to the Second Objection. The rod comforts the Psalmist spiritually. As stated above, the removal of vice is comforting. Hence, corporeal punishment that seeks to mitigate vice is licit since it leads to spiritual comfort.

Reply to the Third Objection. Moses forfeited his right to the Promise Land by angrily bearing the rod of the Lord. Previously, the Lord also said to Moses: “And you shall take in your hand this rod, with which you shall do the signs” (Ex 4:17). Now rods can be used in two ways. Relatively speaking, rods are neutral in that they can be used for a good or a bad purpose. The rod of discipline, simply speaking, drives away folly, as stated above, and for this reason the Lord says, “with which you shall do the signs.” Hence the term “rod” need not denote wrathful indignation on the part of the one who bears the rod.

Saint Basil on the Nature of Unwritten Tradition


Many non-Catholics are confused by the Catholic notion of "tradition." They often want to know where to get "it" or where they can read "it." However, tradition is by its nature unwritten. It is a collection of rites, patterns, attitudes, phrases, terms, and actions.

I'm reading through Yves Congar's well-known book The Meaning of Tradition for a doctoral course entitled Philosophy of Religion. He makes a nice observation from Saint Basil:
"In the the last third of the fourth century, St. Basil who put forward some profound ideas on the nature of tradition, said that it is agraphos, unwritten; simultaneously with the actual transmission of written doctrines, it adds something else to them, something of itself, a new modality other than Scripture. Understood thus as a means of communication, tradition is the transmission of the whole of Christianity, without distinguishing or favoring any on of its elements" (Meaning of Tradition, 20).
Congar also notes that the Eucharist was celebrated for about thirty years without written texts giving instructions for how it should be done. How did the Apostles know how celebrate the Eucharist? They had watched Jesus Christ perform it and they copied him. It was a tradition. The way the Apostles performed actions were then copied by those after them. This is apostolic Christianity. It is the source of tradition. The sign of the cross, the prayers, the attitudes, the adoration of Christ, the special love for Mary - all these passed on to the successive generations without ink.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Monastic Sign-Language Dialects and My Own Parental Sign Language


I recently read that the Trappist monk Thomas Merton (author of Seven Story Mountain) studied the history of monastic sign language. This perked my curiosity and so I looked into the topic.

Apparently monks have been using hand signs for centuries. These hand gestures were used to communicate while maintaining silence.

As a father I have my own hand gestures that I use in Mass for my five children (ages seven to one). There are only a few them. Such gestures include the meanings of:
  • "Be quite or you don't get a donut after Mass!"
  • "Kneel down!"
  • "No you can't go to the bathroom"
  • "It's the consecration - stop moving around!"
Then there are the nice ones, like holding hands with my daughter or arm hugging my sons.

I doubt that monastic sign language has any of these signs. Usually their signs referred to liturgical actions or to the need for a tool (e.g. "hand me that shovel").

I discovered a list of the variously documented monastic sign languages:
  • Trappist/Cistercian Sign Language
  • Cluniac Sign Language
  • Anglo-Saxon Sign Language
  • Augustinian Canon Sign Language
  • Dublin Cathedral Sign Language
  • Ely Cathedral Sign Language
  • Paris Cathedral Sign Language
  • Franciscan Sign Language (tradition says that St Bonaventure created the first finger alphabet)
Linguists have discovered that the various monastic sign-language dialects range from as many as 52 words to as many as 472 words!

Some of these "dialects" are now defunct. From a linguistic point of view, the "dialects" typically follow the rules of the local language. For example, the Paris sign language more closely resembles French rules of grammar, than say, the Dublin version.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

More News on Traditional Anglican Communion and the Catholic Church

More news regarding the Traditional Anglican Communion and the possibility of more Anglican Use Catholic parishes in the near future.

Read the whole thing from Virtue Online.

HT: Dwight Lindley

Monday, January 25, 2010

Rabbi Saul Becomes Apostle Paul: Podcast for the Feast of the Conversion of Saint Paul

Listen to 1st Episode: Rabbi Saul becomes Apostle Paul


Click on the triangular “play” button above.

Get started by listening to this first podcast of the series from www.PaulisCatholic.com.

In this message we look at the Apostle Paul’s background as a Jewish Rabbi and the significance of his conversion for first century Christians and its importance for us today. In particular we examine the details of Paul’s conversion and discover the how it led to the foundational doctrine of Catholic Christianity – that the Church is the Body of Christ.

Godspeed,

Taylor Marshall

Listen to the First Episode: Rabbi Saul Becomes Apostle Paul.

Subscribe to “PaulCast” via iTunes | Subscribe to RSS feed | Download mp3 by right clicking (and choose “Save Link As…”)

You may also like the following podcasts:

Aquinas and More Book Interview with Taylor Marshall


Aquinas and More, the largest online Catholic bookstore, recently interviewed me about the writing process for my new book, The Crucified Rabbi: Judaism and the Origins of the Catholic Church.

You can read the whole interview here.

Below is a sampling of the interview:
We recently had the opportunity to interview Taylor Marshall concerning his new book The Crucified Rabbi. The book is getting rave reviews and the subject matter is extremely interesting. As we approach the holy season of Lent, there is no better time than the present to get a copy of this wonderful new book!

Our interview:

Tell us about your motivation to write your new book.

When I was an Episcopalian priest doing a hospital visit, I met a Jewish rabbi who informed me that when a fellow Jew is suffering, they often invoke the name of that person’s mother in prayer with the belief that it provokes God’s mercy. This intrigued me, especially as to how it might relate to the Catholic practice of invoking the name of Mary—since she is the mother of the suffering servant Jesus Christ. This breakthrough led to many others. Eventually I was convinced that only Catholicism could truly account for the Jewish heritage of Christ and the Apostles. I renounced my Episcopalian ministry and became Catholic.

Writing the book was probably both a faith experience and an academic one. Can you speak to those two points?

Doing research for this book certainly confirmed for me that Christ and the Catholic Church fulfill the Old Testament prophecies. Christ, Mary, and the Apostles were Jewish—Catholicism preserves the vestiges of its Hebraic origins.

From an academic point of view, the most challenging task was to present the material in a non-threatening way. I was very careful to write a book that would not offend or put off Jews. My goal was to write a book that Catholics could share with their Jewish friends. The Crucified Rabbi makes a compelling argument for Christ, without being triumphalistic.

What main points or ideas would you like readers of your book to come away with?

There are two points that I would like readers to discover in The Crucified Rabbi. First, that Jesus of Nazareth perfectly fulfills the Hebrew Scriptures as the Messiah and King of the Jews. I list over 300 prophecies from the Old Testament and show that Jesus fulfills everyone of them. It’s really quite remarkable. Secondly, The Crucified Rabbi demonstrates that only Catholicism (not Protestantism) can truly account for the Jewish prophecies pertaining to the Messiah’s kingdom on earth.
You can read the whole interview here from Aquinas and More.

Please support Aquinas and More by purchasing The Crucified Rabbi through them. Also, please consider writing the first review of the book over at Aquinas and More.

Cale Clarke's review of the book: The Crucified Rabbi by Taylor Marshall

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Top 10 Catholic iPhone Applications


10. Catholic Quote of the Day ($1.99)

This simple daily app program will provide you with over three years worth of daily inspirational quotes from Saints, Popes and other holy and inspired Catholic people. Simple swipe program provides an inspirational nugget each time you open the app.

9. Answers for Catholics ($1.99)
Use this application to quickly access a Biblical verse or subject when someone questions the reason you believe in a certain Catholic Doctrine, Discipline or World View. If you are not familiar with the subject or feel comfortable speaking to it - play the short video or even sit down and play the longer audio for the person asking you a question about your faith. Study the Bible Verses and get to know your faith from God's Word when you are passing time or sitting on an airplane.

8. Recordatio ($1.99)
A collection of all papal encyclicals of the last fifty years. Pretty nice to have with you at all times.

7. Catholic Calendar Universalis (free version)
The free version gives you a great liturgical calendar, the Liturgy of Hours and the Daily Mass reading. It's not as good as iBreviary (featured below) because the translations are not the official ones so you can't pray the Liturgy of the Hours with others. You also have to download the Liturgy of the Hours day by day. If want it all in one place, you have to pay for the $24.99 version...

6. Universalis ($24.99 version)
The $24.00 version gives you everything at Universalis as a download so that you don't need to download the prayers day by day. This would be nice if you live in an area that has little or no wi-fi.

5. Mass Times - Catholic Church Finder (free)
So you're traveling and you need to get to Mass. If you're like me, it's difficult to find Mass times on the web sites of local Catholic parishes (epecially if you're browsing these sites on your iPhone). If you also have this problem, you need the Mass Times app. By teaming up with CatholicWeb.com and TheCatholicDirectory.com database, Mass Times helps you find the closest parish along with Mass times (and Confession times).

4. VerseWise RSV-CE Bible ($4.99)
Pretty expensive for a Bible app, but this is the RSV-Catholic Edition. This version is also known as the "Ignatius Press Bible" (though this version isn't published by Ignatius Press. I've been waiting for this one for some time. At last, here it is.

3. iMissal ($4.99)
This is a great little app with the daily readings for Mass. You can listen to them and you can also adjust the font size. It comes with a nice collection of prayers with the possibility of emailing them to friends.

2. iBreviary ($0.99)
This is the best app for praying the Liturgy of the Hours because it has both English and Latin options (if you're into praying in Latin). On some days, the readings haven't loaded, which is frustrating. Still, I'm placing it as number two, which shows how much I like it. Has the option for five languages: Latin - English - Italian - French - Spanish...and it has the Ambrosian Rite!

1. iPieta ($2.99)
I've got to thank my friend Kevin Branson of the "Journey to Rome" blog for turning me on to this app. It just barely beats the iBreviary. I'd pay $20 for iPieta if they asked that much for it. There is also a Spanish version. Fortunately, they only ask $2.99. Here's what you get in one single app:

• The Douay-Rheims and Latin Vulgate Bibles
• Baltimore Catechisms #1, #2, & #3; Catechism of Christian Doctrine, the Roman Catechism
• Catechism of St. Thomas Aquinas
• Both the Ordinary (Novus Ordo) and Extraordinary (Tridentine) Calendars with access to the day's Gospel and Reading(s) from the D-R & Vulgate.
• Numerous devotions including a version of the Little Office of Our Lady, the 33-Day Total Consecration Preparation, Novenas to the Holy Spirit and to the Divine Mercy, St. Alphonsus Stations of the Cross, and the St. Bridget 1-Year and 12-Year Prayers.
• Spiritual writings by St. Louis Marie de Montfort, St. Teresa of Jesus, St. John of the Cross, St. Catherine of Siena, the Summa Theologica by St. Thomas Aquinas, the Imitation of Christ, Introduction to Devout Life by St. Francis de Sales, selections by St. Jean-Marie Vianney, and the Treatise on Purgatory by St. Catherine of Genoa. The Summa (apart from the Supplement) is also in Latin.
• Papal Encyclicals
• Ecumenical Council Documents
• Scriptural passages for meditating on the mysteries of the Holy Rosary
• Examination of Conscience
• Saint Notes (incomplete and in progress)

I'd love some feedback. Did I miss any great Catholic apps?

Cast your votes: Which is the best Catholic app out there?

You may also enjoy reading:

Saturday, January 23, 2010

The Church Fathers and "Pro-Choice Catholics" Like Nancy Pelosi


Nancy Pelosi and other "pro-choice Catholics" (a contradiction of terms) have publicly stated that many of the early Church Fathers held a lax position on abortion and that the Church's thoroughgoing condemnation of abortion is not "historic."

Typically "pro-choice Catholics" appeal to statements in the writings of the Church Fathers that may indicate a faulty understanding of "fetal ensoulment," that is to say, the moment at which a human soul becomes present with respect to the moment of conception.

Don't be fooled by these arguments. It is true that many thinkers were confused about gestation prior to modern medicine (and sonograms). Nevertheless, the Church Fathers were unanimous in their condemnation of abortion.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Church Fathers on abortion:

The Didache

"The second commandment of the teaching: You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not seduce boys. You shall not commit fornication. You shall not steal. You shall not practice magic. You shall not use potions. You shall not procure [an] abortion, nor destroy a newborn child" (Didache 2:1–2 [A.D. 70]).

The Letter of Barnabas

"The way of light, then, is as follows. If anyone desires to travel to the appointed place, he must be zealous in his works. The knowledge, therefore, which is given to us for the purpose of walking in this way, is the following. . . . Thou shalt not slay the child by procuring abortion; nor, again, shalt thou destroy it after it is born" (Letter of Barnabas 19 [A.D. 75-120]).

The Apocalypse of Peter

"And near that place I saw another strait place . . . and there sat women. . . . And over against them many children who were born to them out of due time sat crying. And there came forth from them rays of fire and smote the women in the eyes. And these were the accursed who conceived and caused abortion" (The Apocalypse of Peter 25 [A.D. 137]).

Athenagoras

"What man of sound mind, therefore, will affirm, while such is our character, that we are murderers?
. . . [W]hen we say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion, on what principle should we commit murder? For it does not belong to the same person to regard the very fetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of God’s care, and when it has passed into life, to kill it; and not to expose an infant, because those who expose them are chargeable with child-murder, and on the other hand, when it has been reared to destroy it" (A Plea for the Christians 35 [A.D. 177]).

Tertullian

"In our case, a murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from the other parts of the body for its sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it matter whether you take away a life that is born, or destroy one that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one; you have the fruit already in its seed" (Apology 9:8 [A.D. 197]).

"Among surgeons’ tools there is a certain instrument, which is formed with a nicely-adjusted flexible frame for opening the uterus first of all and keeping it open; it is further furnished with an annular blade, by means of which the limbs [of the child] within the womb are dissected with anxious but unfaltering care; its last appendage being a blunted or covered hook, wherewith the entire fetus is extracted by a violent delivery.

"There is also [another instrument in the shape of] a copper needle or spike, by which the actual death is managed in this furtive robbery of life: They give it, from its infanticide function, the name of embruosphaktes, [meaning] "the slayer of the infant," which of course was alive. . . .

"[The doctors who performed abortions] all knew well enough that a living being had been conceived, and [they] pitied this most luckless infant state, which had first to be put to death, to escape being tortured alive" (The Soul 25 [A.D. 210]).

"Now we allow that life begins with conception because we contend that the soul also begins from conception; life taking its commencement at the same moment and place that the soul does" (ibid., 27).

"The law of Moses, indeed, punishes with due penalties the man who shall cause abortion [Ex. 21:22–24]" (ibid., 37).

Minucius Felix

"There are some [pagan] women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your [false] gods. . . . To us [Christians] it is not lawful either to see or hear of homicide" (Octavius 30 [A.D. 226]).

Hippolytus

"Women who were reputed to be believers began to take drugs to render themselves sterile, and to bind themselves tightly so as to expel what was being conceived, since they would not, on account of relatives and excess wealth, want to have a child by a slave or by any insignificant person. See, then, into what great impiety that lawless one has proceeded, by teaching adultery and murder at the same time!" (Refutation of All Heresies [A.D. 228]).

Council of Ancyra in AD 341

"Concerning women who commit fornication, and destroy that which they have conceived, or who are employed in making drugs for abortion, a former decree excluded them until the hour of death, and to this some have assented. Nevertheless, being desirous to use somewhat greater lenity, we have ordained that they fulfill ten years [of penance], according to the prescribed degrees" (canon 21 [A.D. 314]).

Basil the Great

"Let her that procures abortion undergo ten years’ penance, whether the embryo were perfectly formed, or not" (First Canonical Letter, canon 2 [A.D. 374]).

"He that kills another with a sword, or hurls an axe at his own wife and kills her, is guilty of willful murder; not he who throws a stone at a dog, and unintentionally kills a man, or who corrects one with a rod, or scourge, in order to reform him, or who kills a man in his own defense, when he only designed to hurt him. But the man, or woman, is a murderer that gives a philtrum, if the man that takes it dies upon it; so are they who take medicines to procure abortion; and so are they who kill on the highway, and rapparees" (ibid., canon 8).

John Chrysostom

"Wherefore I beseech you, flee fornication. . . . Why sow where the ground makes it its care to destroy the fruit?—where there are many efforts at abortion?—where there is murder before the birth? For even the harlot you do not let continue a mere harlot, but make her a murderess also. You see how drunkenness leads to prostitution, prostitution to adultery, adultery to murder; or rather to a something even worse than murder. For I have no name to give it, since it does not take off the thing born, but prevents its being born. Why then do thou abuse the gift of God, and fight with his laws, and follow after what is a curse as if a blessing, and make the chamber of procreation a chamber for murder, and arm the woman that was given for childbearing unto slaughter? For with a view to drawing more money by being agreeable and an object of longing to her lovers, even this she is not backward to do, so heaping upon thy head a great pile of fire. For even if the daring deed be hers, yet the causing of it is thine" (Homilies on Romans 24 [A.D. 391]).

Jerome

"I cannot bring myself to speak of the many virgins who daily fall and are lost to the bosom of the Church, their mother. . . . Some go so far as to take potions, that they may insure barrenness, and thus murder human beings almost before their conception. Some, when they find themselves with child through their sin, use drugs to procure abortion, and when, as often happens, they die with their offspring, they enter the lower world laden with the guilt not only of adultery against Christ but also of suicide and child murder" (Letters 22:13 [A.D. 396]).

The Apostolic Constitutions

"Thou shalt not use magic. Thou shalt not use witchcraft; for he says, ‘You shall not suffer a witch to live’ [Ex. 22:18]. Thou shall not slay thy child by causing abortion, nor kill that which is begotten. . . . [I]f it be slain, [it] shall be avenged, as being unjustly destroyed" (Apostolic Constitutions 7:3 [A.D. 400]).

Hat tip to Catholic Answers for collecting all these quotes.

Scripture, Icons, and Relics are Now Floating in a Russian Space Station!

Icon and Crucifix Floating in Russian Space Station

I've got admit it - I'm a bit disappointed that the Eastern Orthodox beat us Catholics to this - they took the Gospels, four icons, crosses and a relic of the True Cross into space. How cool is that?

I saw this link via newadvent.org and just had to share it with all of you:

"Relics, icons and crosses are onboard International Space Station, cosmonaut says"
Catholic News Agency

Moscow, Russia, Jan 20, 2010 / 12:11 am (CNA).- The Gospels, four icons, crosses and a relic of the True Cross have been taken aboard the Russian segment of the International Space Station (ISS), a Russian cosmonaut has reported. A photo taken by the station crew shows an icon and a crucifix floating in zero gravity in the ISS.

Writing on his blog at the website of the Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos), Cosmonaut Maksim Suraev responded to readers’ questions about religious symbols on the space station.

“We have four holy icons on the Russia segment. We also have the Gospels and a big cross,” he said, according to a blog entry translated by Russia Today in November 2009.

Russia Today reported that the Lord’s Divine Cross was given to A.N. Merminov, the head of Roscosmos, by the late Patriarch of Moscow Aleksy II. The cross was delivered to the station in 2006 by the crew of Soyuz TMA-8.
Read the rest of the article from Catholic News Agency (CNA): Relics, icons and crosses are onboard International Space Station

You may also like reading:

Friday, January 22, 2010

Saint Paul on the Unity of the Catholic Church (An Argument Against the Terms “Lutheran” and “Calvinist”)


Non-Catholics (and yes, even the Eastern Orthodox) do not enjoy the ecclesial unity Saint Paul prescribed for the Church of Jesus Christ. Saint Paul is resolute in his conviction that the Church of Christ must be one. Most of his epistles specifically speak against disunity within the Church. Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians seems to have been written for the very purpose of encouraging church unity against the tendency of “church splits”:

I appeal to you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree and that there be no dissensions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment. For it has been reported to me by Chloe’s people that there is quarreling among you, my brethren. What I mean is that each one of you says, “I belong to Paul,” or “I belong to Apollos,” or “I belong to Peter,” or “I belong to Christ.” Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Cor 1:10-13).

The Apostle’s purpose in writing to the Corinthian Christians was, “that there be no divisions” in the Church. Paul could not conceive of Christians naming themselves after human church leaders. Paul exhorted the Corinthians not to tolerate those who claimed to be “Pauline” Christians. Nor should there be any “Apollonian” or “Petrine” Christians. Given Paul’s insistence against name-bearing sects, we might safely conclude that he would fiercely condemn the practice of certain Christians who identify themselves as “Lutherans” or “Calvinists.” Even the word “denomination” comes from the Latin de nomine meaning “of a name”. This denominational arrangement is completely foreign to the teachings of Paul. For this reason, the Catholic Church never has accepted a “denominational” understanding of Church.

Notice also how Paul associates “name-calling” with salvation.

Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Cor 1:13)

Recall how Paul understands the Church as a participation in the person and life of Christ. To call oneself “Pauline” or “Lutheran” is to claim participation in the one whose name you bear. To be a “denominational Christian” is tantamount to identifying “Paul” or “Luther” as the redeemer and founder of one’s faith. In fact, Saint Paul specifically instructed Christians in every case to “avoid those who cause schism” (Rom 16:17). Even if the Church requires renewal, Paul believes that division is not the means to achieve it.

Continue reading this article by Taylor Marshall at Called to Communion by clicking here.

You may also like listening to this talk by Taylor Marshall: "Did Paul believe in the Catholic Church? (mp3)"


Please click on the triangular "play button" above to listen to Taylor's "Did Paul believe in the Catholic Church?"

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Saint Ambrose on the Beautiful Martyrdom of Saint Agnes


I came across this today from the Office of Readings. It is a beautiful account of the Christian witness of Saint Agnes, a twelve year old martyr. Saint Agnes demonstrates how the early Church was thoroughly committed to chastity and consecrated virginity.

Now that I'm a father of daughters, Saint Agnes witness is even more compelling to me. Moreover, Ambrose' prose is very powerful. Even in translation, you can perceive that he is a very powerful writer.

From On Virgins by Saint Ambrose:
Today is the birthday of a virgin; let us imitate her purity. It is the birthday of a martyr; let us offer ourselves in sacrifice. It is the birthday of Saint Agnes, who is said to have suffered martyrdom at the age of twelve. The cruelty that did not spare her youth shows all the more clearly the power of faith in finding one so young to bear it witness.

There was little or no room in that small body for a wound. Though she could scarcely receive the blow, she could rise superior to it. Girls of her age cannot bear even their parents’ frowns and, pricked by a needle, weep as for a serious wound. Yet she shows no fear of the blood-stained hands of her executioners. She stands undaunted by heavy, clanking chains. She offers her whole body to be put to the sword by fierce soldiers. She is too young to know of death, yet is ready to face it. Dragged against her will to the altars, she stretches out her hands to the Lord in the midst of the flames, making the triumphant sign of Christ the victor on the altars of sacrilege. She puts her neck and hands in iron chains, but no chain can hold fast her tiny limbs.

A new kind of martyrdom! Too young to be punished, yet old enough for a martyr’s crown; unfitted for the contest, yet effortless in victory, she shows herself a master in valour despite the handicap of youth. As a bride she would not be hastening to join her husband with the same joy she shows as a virgin on her way to punishment, crowned not with flowers but with holiness of life, adorned not with braided hair but with Christ himself.

In the midst of tears, she sheds no tears herself. The crowds marvel at her recklessness in throwing away her life untasted, as if she had already lived life to the full. All are amazed that one not yet of legal age can give her testimony to God. So she succeeds in convincing others of her testimony about God, though her testimony in human affairs could not yet be accepted. What is beyond the power of nature, they argue, must come from its creator.

What menaces there were from the executioner, to frighten her; what promises made, to win her over; what influential people desired her in marriage! She answered: “To hope that any other will please me does wrong to my Spouse. I will be his who first chose me for himself. Executioner, why do you delay? If eyes that I do not want can desire this body, then let it perish.” She stood still, she prayed, she offered her neck.

You could see fear in the eyes of the executioner, as if he were the one condemned; his right hand trembled, his face grew pale as he saw the girl’s peril, while she had no fear for herself. One victim, but a twin martyrdom, to modesty and to religion; Agnes preserved her virginity, and gained a martyr’s crown.

Chronology of Saint Mark' Life


According to tradition, Saint Mark the Evangelist was the first bishop of Alexandria, Egypt. Here's a time line constructed from the Acts of the Apostles and Eusebius' Church History.
  • 41-44 Mark traveled to Alexandria, Egypt in the first years of Claudius (Eusebius). This is not mentioned in Acts, but it seems that the Chruch fled Jerusalem after the martyrdom of James the Greater in about 42. This is also the window in which tradition places Peter's first visit to Rome.
  • 46-47 Mark with Paul and Barnabas in Jerusalem, Antioch (Acts 12:25), and Salamis (Acts 13:5)
  • 49/50 Mark in Antioch when he split from Paul and went to Cyprus (Acts 15:39). From there, Mark returns to Alexandria, Egypt where he leads the Church of Alexandria as bishop.
  • 61-62 Mark appoints Bishop Anianus as the lead bishop of Alexandria in the eight year of Nero (Eusebius)
That's all we know for sure. Eusebius doesn't say that Mark died in 61/62 only that he left Anianus in charge of Alexandria.

I would like to suggest that Mark was called to Rome in 61/62 to serve closely with Peter. Why do I say this? Well, Mark was with Peter "in Babylon" (1 Pet 5:13), which is a code for "in Rome." Thus, Mark must have left Egypt and traveled to Rome.

However, Mark must have then been dispatched again because he seems to be near Saint Timothy in the regions of Ephesus by the mid-to-late 60s, because Saint Paul asked Timothy to send Mark to him (2 Tim 4:11).

So here's my suggested chronology:
  • 41-44 Mark traveled to Alexandria in the first years of Claudius (Eusebius) which was the time of the first persecution of Christians in Jerusalem
  • 46-47 Mark with Paul and Barnabas in Jerusalem, Antioch (Acts 12:25), and Salamis (Acts 13:5)
  • 49/50 Mark in Antioch when he split from Paul and went to Cyprus (Acts 15:39). Mark then goes to Alexandria (speculation here).
  • 50-61 Mark serves as Apostolic delgate or "bishop" of Alexandria (Eusebius).
  • 61/62 Mark appoints Bishop Anianus as the lead bishop of Alexandria in the eight year of Nero (Eusebius)
  • 61/62 Mark then goes to Rome where he serves with Peter (1 Pet 5:13) and writes the Gospel of Mark based on Peter's Roman preaching (Papias).
  • 63-66 Mark then tours the churches of Asia Minor (2 Tim 4:11) in proximity to Timothy; meanwhile Paul goes to Spain
  • 66/67 Paul (who is preparing for impending martyrdom) recalls Mark to Rome (2 Tim 4:11).
  • Soon after, Mark returned to Alexandria because tradition says that he was martyred there by being dragged around the city. I wager that this happened before AD 70.
Thoughts?

Saturday, January 16, 2010

NFL Football Teams in Latin

You've heard of NFL "throwback" uniforms which hearken back to the original vesture of older teams. Even Pepsi has a "throwback" campaign - using an older-looking logo and going back to "real sugar."

So here's the ultimate throwback - the NFL team names in Latin. That's right folks, Cicero knew the NFL teams by these Latin names - okay, not really, but if football had been played in the Colosseum, the following names would be the NFL (ahem...Foedus Nationale Pedipila) teams.

I'd appreciate any advice from my fellow Latinists. Last week I asked my Latin students to come up with Latin names for the NFL teams. Here's what we came up with. I'm sure that we've overlooked something.
  • Pittsburgh Ferrarii (Ferrarii sounds much more blue blood than "steel-worker" doesn't it?)
  • Washington Rubracutes (Saying it in Latin makes it sound more politically correct, doesn't it?)
  • Green Bay Arctatores
  • Chicago Ursi
  • New York Gigantes
  • Indianapolis Equulei
  • San Francisco Undequinquagintatori (This is my personal favorite NFL Latin name - literally "one from 50ers")
  • Dallas Bovipueri (My favorite team! - also a great Latin name)
  • Cleveland Bruni (Even in Latin, it's still the most boring name in football history)
  • Detroit Leones
  • Oakland Raptores
  • New England Patriotici
  • Philadelphia Aquilae
  • St. Louis Arietes
  • Kansas City Principes
  • Miami Delphini
  • Arizona Cardinales
  • Denver Sonipedes
  • Tennessee Titani
  • Buffalo Gulieli (plural abbreviation of the Latin name "William")
  • Minnesota Vikentes (yeah, we just punted on this one...)
  • New York Aeroplana (this term turns out to be neuter plural of airplane in "contemporary Latin")
  • Baltimore Corvi
  • Tampa Bay Archipiratae (it rhymes!)
  • San Diego Fulgurifactores (I'm not satisfied with this as "Chargers," but I wanted to keep the "electric" meaning)
  • Houston Texani (we punted on this one, too)
  • Cincinnati Bengalenses (I'm quite proud of this one)
  • Jacksonville Pantherae (yes, the scientific name for a jaguar is "panthera onca")
  • Carolina Pantherae (unfortunately redundant with Jacksonville above)
  • New Orleans Sancti
  • Seattle Pandiones
  • Atlanta Falcones
I'm especially grateful to my students Dominic Sipe, Jacob Pearson, Max Biko, Daniel "Harundo" Reed, and Joseph Davis for their creative help in generating this list.

If you wish to reproduce this list, please give credit and a link.

I'm at the Dallas march for life - it is so awesome

The crowd at OL of Guad for the Mass and March is Huge. I'm here with the Franciscan Friars of Renewal and Faustina Academy. Look for photos via Twitter: @taylorrmarshall.

Sent from iPhone.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Why 153 Fish in John's Gospel? The Jewish Answer from Mark Drogin


Mark Drogin tells us why the Apostles caught exactly 153 fish in St John's Gospel:
The beginning of the final Gospel: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.... and the Word became flesh.” The entire Gospel focuses our attention on the Living Word of God: Jesus of Nazareth. The Evangelist also reveals that this Living Word of God is the Living Bread of Life. The Living Bread is the Living Word.

Matthew begins by telling us that Jesus the Messiah is the Son of David; John, in sharp contrast, does not tell us that Jesus is the Son of David. Matthew alone includes the Sermon on the Mount and Jesus' famous Jewish statement: “I did not come to destroy Torah.” (Mt 5:17) In First Century Judaism, “Torah” and “Word of God” were synonyms: Torah is the Word of God. Again we see John taking the synoptics to a higher level, taking us deeper into the Gospel. Jesus promised to bring Torah to its completion (cf Mt 5:18); the final Gospel reveals that Torah has become flesh in Jesus of Nazareth.

At the end of his life, “when Moses had written down this Torah,” he gave this order: “[Every seven years] you shall read this Torah aloud in the presence of all Israel.” (Deut 31:9-11). Over the centuries, an annual cycle of readings was adopted to fulfill this requirement. The cycle of Torah readings – or “portions” – varied from century to century and place to place.

The 1910 Jewish Encyclopedia reports that a three-year Torah cycle used in Palestine around the First Century had 153 Torah portions. “The 153 parts into which the Torah was divided in the cycle of three years, which prevailed in Palestine till the exiles from Spain brought their customs into the Holy Land, are known as 'sedarim'.” (“Parashah,” Cyrus Adler, Lewis N Dembitz)
Mark Drogin has a Masters in Theology from the University of Dallas and has written extensively on the Jewish roots of the Gospel and the Church. His parents and grandparents were atheistic, socialistic Jews. In 1974, at the age of 28, Mark was baptized; then he met Father Arthur Klyber, CSsR, a Jewish Catholic priest who had been ordained in 1932. Mark helped Father Klyber found Remnant of Israel in 1975 and worked closely with him for over 20 years. Today, Mark continues Father Klyber’s work as Managing Director of Remnant of Israel. He welcomes your comments at droginmark@yahoo.com

You may also like:

I'll be on William Bence's radio show this morning


I know it's late notice, but I'll be on the William Bence's radio show in about 20 minutes - at 8:00am Central Time. We'll be talking about Judaism and Catholicism and my new book The Crucified Rabbi.

Godspeed,
Taylor Marshall

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Remember the First Five Popes as "PLACE"


Below are the oldest existing lists of the bishops of Rome following Saint Peter. As you can see, Saint Linus (mentioned in 2 Tim 4:21) is universally held as the immediate successor of Saint Peter in Rome. Clement (Phil 4:3) is also reckoned as a successor.
  • Linus, Cletus, Clemens (ca. A.D. 160, Hegesippus, ap. Epiphanium, Canon of Mass).
  • Linus, Anencletus, Clemens (ca. A.D. 170s, Irenaeus, Africanus ap. Eusebium).
  • Linus, Clemens, Cletus, Anacletus (220s-230s, Hippolytus).
  • Linus, Cletus, Anacletus, Clemens (ca. late 200s [?], Poem against Marcion).
  • Linus, Anacletus, Clemens (400s Jerome).
  • Linus, Clemens, Anacletus (400s Optatus, Augustine).[1]
It seems that there is some confusion about "Anacletus." In the Anti-Marcionite poem and in Hippolytus, the name became redundant and mistaken for two different bishops: "Cletus" and "Anacletus." The older lists indicate that Cletus and Anacletus are one and the same man - the former being an abbreviation of the latter.

The received tradition is easy to remember. I teach my students to simply remember Rome as the "PLACE" of the first five Popes:

P - Peter
L - Linus

A - Anacletus

C - Clement

E - Evaristus


[1] Catholic Encyclopedia, "Linus" (can be accessed at newadvent.org).

Monday, January 11, 2010

Free Google Books Version of My Book The Crucified Rabbi

There is now a free Google version of The Crucified Rabbi: Judaism and the Origins of Catholic Christianity at the online Google Books program. Much of the content is restricted - but it gives you a good feel for the book as a whole. About 30% of the book is there for free.

Please click the following link for the free version of the book over at Google Books: Google version of The Crucified Rabbi.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Why Was Christ Baptized If He Was Without Sin?


The following is from Taylor Marshall's book The Crucified Rabbi: Judaism and the Origins of Catholic Christianity.
If you prefer to listen to a full audio presentation on this topic, click here to listen.

We may find it perplexing that Christ began his public ministry with a ceremonial washing administered by John the Baptist. Even though Christ was without sin, he still received this Jewish tevilah (tevilah = Jewish ceremonial water ritual) in order “to fulfill all righteousness” (Mt 3:15). Saint Ignatius of Antioch (writing before A.D. 108) said that Christ was baptized not so that the water should purify Him, but rather “that He might purify the water,” so that others might be saved through baptism.

It is also at this moment that God the Father announces his love for His Son, and the Holy Spirit descends upon Jesus to confirm that He is the anointed Messiah. This is the first depiction of the Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity, and this is why Catholics are baptized “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” The image of the Holy Spirit descending on Jesus echoes the account in Genesis where the Spirit of God was “moved over the face of the waters” (Gen 1:2). At the baptism of Jesus, the Holy Spirit once again hovered over the waters as God inaugurated a New Creation.

According to the Catholic Church, the baptism of John the Baptist was not the sacrament of baptism, but a Jewish tevilah preparing the Jewish people for the advent of the Messiah. John the Baptist did not administer the Christian sacrament of baptism because he did not baptize in the Trinitarian name. Moreover, the Apostles re-baptized those who had received “only the baptism of John” (cf. Acts 19:1-4). Saint Augustine wrote, “Those who were baptized with John’s baptism needed to be baptized with the baptism of our Lord.”

The Christian sacrament of baptism is an incorporation of a person into the death and resurrection of Christ for the remission of sins (Rom 6:4-6). Thus, the twelve Apostles first administered the sacrament of baptism on the day of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit descended upon them and enabled them to proclaim the Gospel to the Jewish pilgrims of Jerusalem (Acts 2:1-41).

Baptism, the Tevilah of Conversion

The Jewish rabbis also use the tevilah washing as a sign of conversion. Thus, Orthodox Jews require that a convert to Judaism:
  • be instructed about how to live as a Jew
  • undergo kabbalat ol mitzvot (“receiving the charge to obey the commandments”)
  • receive mila (“circumcision”)
  • undergo a tevilah (“immersion” in a mikvah)
A court of three witnesses must also supervise the conversion. Women converts cannot be circumcised for obvious reasons and so they receive only the tevilah immersion in a mikvah pool.

In light of the established Jewish customs for conversion, the debates in the early Church over whether Christian converts were obligated to receive both baptism (tevilah) and circumcision can be better understood. The Apostles decided at the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15) that converts to Christianity need not be circumcised. The Apostle Paul, who was present at this council, later explained why Christians do not require the rite of circumcision:
In Christ, you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of flesh in the circumcision of Christ. You were buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead (Col 2:11).
Baptism as the sacramental tevilah of the Church is sufficient to incorporate a believer into the Kingdom of God (Jn 3:3-5). The Christian has already received “spiritual circumcision” by virtue of his being incorporated into the circumcised body of Christ. The circumcision of Christ applies to the baptized Christian because the believer is united to Christ’s person and enjoys all the blessings of Christ’s sonship. In similar manner, Christians are counted as having fulfilled the Mosaic Law because Christ perfectly fulfilled the Law of Moses.

Therefore, Catholics baptize infants for the same reason that Jews circumcise infants. The children of believers are accounted as “holy” (1 Cor 7:14) and are entitled to the covenantal blessings received by being incorporated into the communal life of the Church. For this reason, Saint Peter said that the promise of baptism “is to you and to your children” (Acts 2:39). A Jewish man or woman at the time of the Apostles would not have been able to comprehend the modern Evangelical claim that babies and young children cannot and do not belong to the ritual life of the community.

Is Baptism a Ceremonial Washing?

The Hebrew word tevilah was translated by the Greek word baptisma. They both mean wash or immerse. The idea of plunging into water is associated with Christ plunging into death and rising again in newness of life (Rom 6:4-6). Baptism unites us to the mystery of Christ’s death and resurrection and it is therefore associated with regeneration, recreation, the forgiveness of sins, life everlasting, and the final resurrection of the body. Christ spoke of his death as a “baptism” when he asked John and James, “Are you able to be baptized with the baptism with which I am baptized?” (Mk 10:38)
As we can see then, Christ brings all the ceremonial washings of the Old Testament to fulfillment in His own body and ministry. The Old Covenant water rites find their fulfillment in His institution of New Covenant baptism:
All the Old Covenant rites find their fulfillment in Christ Jesus. He begins his public life after having himself baptized by St. John the Baptist in the Jordan. After his resurrection Christ gives this mission to his apostles: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1223).
The Spirit over the waters at creation, the Great Flood and deliverance of Noah, the passing through the Red Sea with Moses, the crossing of the Jordan River, the customary ceremonial washings—all these events point toward Christ and find their fulfillment in the sacrament of baptism.

Saint Paul teaches that we enter into Christ’s death and resurrection by “putting on Christ” (Gal 3:27) and being regenerated through the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5). Baptism formally identifies us with Christ’s death (for the forgiveness of sins) and his resurrection (for our resurrection and eternal life).
Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life (Rom 6:4-6).
Baptism also plants in us the “incorruptible seed” of God’s Word (1 Pet 1:23) so that we might grow to full maturity in Christ.
Listen to the free Crucified Rabbi Podcast by Taylor Marshall on iTunes: click here.

The Ancient Church of Rome was Ruled by a Single Bishop (Rome's Early Mono-Episcopate)


Martyrdom of St Clement

Dissenting Catholic scholars love to trot out the "real story" about how the original Church of Rome was not ruled by a sole bishop, but by a council of presbyters. Of course, they create this version of church history so that they can dissent from the Pope who is the Bishop of Rome.

Their theory goes like this:
Even though Judaism was hierarchical, all "early Christians" in the first century were egalitarian and opposed to hierarchy. The Church of Rome in the first century also was egalitarian and was ruled by a council of elders or presbyters. The political structure of the "mono-episcopate" or "rule by one bishop" only developed in the second century when the church began to require institutional structure.
Dissenters appeal to two ancient sources in order to "prove" their opinion:
First, they appeal to the Epistle of Clement (written in AD 80s or 90s) and claim that the letter doesn't mention a singular bishop of Rome. Instead, they claim that the Epistle of Clement is actually the "Letter of a Roman Committee to which Clement belonged."

Secondly, they cite Ignatius of Antioch's Epistle to the Church of Rome, which, unlike his other letters, fails to mention a singular bishop of Rome by name.
These two sources are supposed to be a slam dunk argument against the Catholic belief that Peter was the first "bishop of Rome" and that Peter was succeeded by Linus, Anacletus, Clement, Evarstus...John Paul II, and finally by Benedict XVI.

Well, I've got bad news for all of them. You wanna know why? Well, the Epistle of Saint Clement explicitly teaches that each city is ruled by a single bishop, surrounded by priests and his deacons. Did you get that? Saint Clement taught the mono-episcopate...

At this point, I'd like to interrupt the post with a loud:
"boom-shaka-laka!"

Don't let the Protestants or Catholic dissenters fool you. If you actually read the Epistle of Clement, you'll come across this passage where Clement discusses Christian worship. Here he explains that only one man (the bishop) fulfills "peculiar services" of Jesus Christ for the local church:
[Christ] has enjoined offerings to be presented and service to be performed to Him, and that not thoughtlessly or irregularly, but at the appointed times and hours. Where and by whom He desires these things to be done, He Himself has fixed by His own supreme will, in order that all things, being piously done according to His good pleasure, may be acceptable unto Him.

For his own peculiar services are assigned to the high priest, and their own proper place is prescribed to the priests, and their own special ministrations devolve on the Levites. The layman is bound by the laws that pertain to laymen" (1 Clement 40).
Here we find Clement describing the structure of the Church. We have a high priest to whom Christ's "own peculiar services are assigned." We have a plurality of priests. We have the deacons, who are often called "Levites" in the early church. Last of all, we have the laymen. This is the exact structure of every Catholic diocese on earth! We called it the "threefold order" of the bishop, priests, and deacons.

As to the the silence of Ignatius of Antioch (AD 108) regarding the name of the bishop of Rome - Ignatius does not say that there isn't a bishop of Rome - he merely remains silent on the matter. This is for good reason. Rome is the capital of the pagan Roman Empire. It would be rather irresponsible to reveal the name of the Christian Roman leader, especially since the bishop of Rome lived there within its walls!

So next time you hear someone say, "Well, the Church of Rome didn't really have a bishop in the early days," immediately do three things:
  1. Have the person read 1 Clement 40
  2. Explain why it would have been imprudent for Ignatius to have mentioned the bishop of Rome by name
  3. Say: "boom-shaka-laka"

Friday, January 08, 2010

Martin Luther was a Cafeteria Catholic


It is likely that you have by now heard someone say, "You can't be a Cafeteria Catholic." The term "Cafeteria Catholic" denotes those Catholics who do not hold the entire Catholic Faith, but instead "pick and choose" from those doctrines that they like about Catholicism - just as people pick and choose their food in a cafeteria line. The person at the cafeteria: "I'll take potato soup, yum. And chicken fried stead. Nope, I'll pass on the veggies. Oh, and green jello. Never mind, make that red jello."

Likewise, the Cafeteria Catholic: "I'll take liturgy. Christmas. Easter. "God loves me." But I'll pass on the confession, pro-life, and contraception teachings." That's it, in a nutshell.

It recently dawned on me that the Protestant Reformation, far from being a return to Scripture and the Church Fathers, was actually a movement intent on "picking and choosing." Here's an example from the writings of Martin Luther:
"Many sweat to reconcile St. Paul and St. James, but in vain. 'Faith justifies' and 'faith does not justify' contradict each other flatly. If any one can harmonize them I will give him my doctor's hood and let him call me a fool."
Here stands the great 'Reformer' pitting Sacred Scripture against Sacred Scripture. Here is a man who calls the Holy Spirit into contradiction.

Many do not know that Luther himself added the word "alone" to Romans 3:28 in his German translation of the Scriptures, even though it does not appear in the original Greek. He intended to substantiate his doctrine of "faith alone" by adding the word since it doesn't actually occur in Saint Paul's writings. Luther also wished to cast the Epistle of Saint James from the canonical Scriptures.

This tells me that the Luther did not veneration for the Word of God. He was not simply a "cafeteria theologian" - he was a cafeteria Scripture reader. He added and subtracted from Scripture so as to conform the Bible to his tastes!

We are not allowed to add to God's word when it suits our theology, nor can we subtract that which offends us. So much for Martin Luther...the cafeteria Catholic.

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

I'm off to give some talks at Steubenville for the next two days!

I'm off to Franciscan University in Steubenville to give a few talks about Judaism, Catholicism, and Liturgy. I'll try to post something from my phone (as I'm doing know from the airport).

Godspeed,
Taylor Marshall

Placing the Number 'One Billion' in Pespective


The next time you hear a politician use the word billion in a casual manner, think about this:
  • A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
  • A billion minutes ago Jesus was walking the earth.
  • A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.
  • A billion days ago no one walked on the earth on two feet.
  • A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes - at the rate the United States government is spending it.
Something to think about as we begin a New Year...

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Cale Clarke's Review of The Crucified Rabbi in Catholic Insight Magazine


If you like, please watch the short The Crucified Rabbi video

“The Crucified Rabbi” Review by Cale Clarke from Catholic Insight Magazine.

Cale blogs at the FX: Faith Explained. Here Cale's very positive review of the book:

Does the Pope wear a yarmulke?

That query, along with many others, is answered by Taylor Marshall in his new book, The Crucified Rabbi: Judaism and the Origins of Catholic Christianity (Saint John Press, 2009, www.crucifiedrabbi.com).

Marshall, a former Episcopalian priest in the United States and current PhD. Student at the University of Dallas, had his interest in Catholicism piqued by an encounter with a rabbi during a hospital visit. The rabbi told Marshall of a Jewish tradition that invoking the name of a suffering individual’s mother in prayer draws God’s mercy upon that person.

Marshall, who had a developing devotion to Mary, saw the connection between this Jewish belief and Mary’s role as mother in the household of God. For Marshall, looking at Christianity from a Jewish perspective became a key to unlocking other treasures of the Catholic faith - spiritual riches which became Taylor’s, too, when he and his family converted in 2006.

Marshall notes that the Catechism of the Catholic Church stresses the connection between the Old Covenant and the New. In fact, it states that a Catholic should gird one’s faith with a “better knowledge of the Jewish people’s faith and religious life” in order to better understand Catholicism (CCC 1096). And that is exactly what Marshall sets about doing.

Two chapters alone are well worth the price of the book: “Jewish Messiah, Catholic Christ”, and “Jewish Kingdom, Catholic Church”. Here Marshall deals with an important question: If Jesus truly fits the profile of the Messiah, then why haven’t the majority of Jews recognized him as such?

First, it must be pointed out that many Jews have accepted “Yeshua” (Jesus) as Moshiach - beginning, of course, with the Blessed Virgin, and all of the Apostles, including Saint Paul, a former rabbi himself. Peter’s Pentecost sermon, recorded in Acts 2, netted thousands of Jewish converts for the fisherman in a single day (p. 45). Latter-day conversions are not rare, either: the former chief rabbi of Rome, Eugenio Zolli, for one, not to mention the hundreds of thousands today who have become “Messianic Jews” or “Hebrew Catholics”.

But despite the fact that Jesus fulfills over three hundred specific messianic prophecies of the Old Testament (a valuable list of which constitutes an appendix in The Crucified Rabbi), many Jews continue to “look for another” (cf. Matt. 11:3). One reason why, says Marshall, is that Jesus has not, despite the impressive list of fulfilled messianic prophecies, fulfilled all of them, such as those having to do with a final state of world peace. But Catholics realize that Jesus will accomplish the remainder at his second coming.

Marshall mentions an interesting Jewish belief that sheds light on this: “After studying the twelfth chapter of Zechariah, some rabbis concluded that there would be two different Messiahs. The first they call Messiah ben Joseph (“Messiah son of Joseph”)…a suffering, humiliated Messiah who would prepare the way for the second Messiah…Messiah ben David (“Messiah son of David”)…an apocalyptic Messiah who will reunite the children of Israel around him, march into Jerusalem, vanquish God’s enemies, and reestablish the Kingdom of God on earth…For the Christian on the other hand, there are not two Messiahs, but one Messiah who comes to earth twice” (p. 46). Jesus, as both the adopted son of Joseph and descendant of David, will fulfill every expectation.

Such sparkling insights appear on almost every page, as Marshall deftly compares various features of Judaism to their Catholic counterparts: the priesthood, vestments, holy days, marriage, and saints, to name but a few. Saint Augustine’s dictum, “The New Covenant is in the Old, concealed; the Old Covenant is in the New, revealed” is on full display in Rabbi. The result is a clear vision of what many Hebrew Catholics see in the Catholic Church, right down to the architecture of a local parish, with its tabernacle and altar of sacrifice: it is Judaism with the Messiah having come; it is the true religion made accessible to everyone.

This was God’s plan from the beginning, as he affirmed to the father of the Jewish people, Abraham: “And by you and your seed shall all the families of the earth bless themselves” (Gen. 28:14). As Marshall notes (p. 28), “This is why the New Testament begins with what has bored most readers…for centuries: a genealogy…’The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham’ (Matt. 1:1)”. Jesus is the promised seed of Abraham who blesses not only his fellow Jews, but all nations. The scope of his salvation is universal - “Catholic”.

So, does the Pope wear a yarmulke? I’m not telling - you need to read The Crucified Rabbi yourself to find out. Hats off to Taylor Marshall for writing it.

Please visit Cale's site "The Faith Explained" by clicking here. He has some great resources and he also does speaking engagements.

Visit the book's page on amazon.com by clicking here.



Thank you Cale!

Godspeed,
Taylor
Subscribe to feed
Related Posts with Thumbnails

This blog, Canterbury Tales, is solemnly consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

“Et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius
ut revelentur ex multis cordibus cogitationes.”
(Luke 2:35, Vulgate)
Our Lady, Seat of Wisdom, pray for us.
#navbar-iframe { height:0px; visibility:hidden; display:none; }