Sunday, March 30, 2008

Islam overtakes Catholicism as the World's Largest Religion


This is what happens when Christians lose faith, contracept, abort, and fail to evangelize. It should serve as a wake-up call. I hate to admit it, but Catholicism is no longer the world's largest religion:
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Islam has overtaken Roman Catholicism as the biggest single religious denomination in the world, the Vatican said on Sunday.

Monsignor Vittorio Formenti, who compiled the Vatican's newly-released 2008 yearbook of statistics, said Muslims made up 19.2 percent of the world's population and Catholics 17.4 percent.

"For the first time in history we are no longer at the top: the Muslims have overtaken us," Formenti told Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano in an interview, saying the data referred to 2006.

He said that if all Christian groups were considered, including Orthodox churches, Anglicans and Protestants, then Christians made up 33 percent of the world's population -- or about 2 billion people.
Read full article from Reuters UK.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Great video of Houston's New Cathedral


Cardinal DiNardo and the faithful of Houston prepare for the consecration of their new (beautiful) Cathedral.

ABC news of Houston has some great video footage of the new cathedral. Watch the one on the new high altar if you have the time: Video footage of the new Houston Cathedral via ABC13.

Hat tip: Oso Famoso

Friday, March 28, 2008

Review of the Seventh Trappist Ale: Achel


Now that Lent is other and we are happily enjoying the resurrection of Jesus Christ, I tried the Achel that my friend Reev found for me.

Here's the review.

Dark ruddy color. Comfortable nose.

Nutty taste. Strong licorice flavor - almost like Jagermeister! Hint of bean. Meat in the after taste. Heavy. Hints of banana. Very interesting beer. I haven't had one that tastes like it.

See my review of the other Six Trappist Ales of the Known World.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

The Catholic understanding of the "Brothers of Jesus" (so-called)

The local Council of Rome (649) explicitly states that Mary is Ever-Virgin.

The ecumenical Councils of Ephesus (431), of Constantinople II (553), and of Constantinople III (680-81) refer to the Blessed Virgin Mary as "aeiparthenos" which is Greek for "Ever-Virgin".

Dr. William Tighe recommends the following regarding the identity of the "brothers of Jesus":

John McHugh, The Mother of Jesus in the New Testament (1975).

McHugh considers all the alternatives, and comes down in favor of the view that the "brothers" were most likely foster-brothers.

Hat tip to William Tighe.

Americans think favorably of Pope Benedict XVI


According to CWN 58% of Americans have a favorable opinion of Pope Benedict XVI, while 13% hold a negative view of him.

Peter Enns suspended from Westminster Seminary

One of my favorite professors at Westminster Theological Seminary was suspended today for his new book Inspiration and Incarnation.

It's too bad. Prof. Peter Enns was very intelligent and I never had impression that he was somehow undermining the Gospel, even as Calvinists understand it. He was always very conservative with respect to OT criticism. I found him helpful because he taught us to see that God uses cultural values and signs of the ancient Semitic context in order to communicate His love for Israel. I'll have to take a look at the book to find out its "heresy" so-called.

The thing is this, the board and donors of WTS are afraid that anything that doesn't sound and look like the lay "scholarship" of 145 page R.C. Sproul books is somehow suspect. And in the end, money talks. The same thing happened to Norman Shepherd.

Here's the announcement:

March 27, 2008

Thank you very much for your prayers for the special meeting of the Board of Trustees that was held on March 26 to address the disunity of the faculty regarding the theological issues related to Dr. Peter Enns’ book, Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament. After a full day of deliberation, the Board of Trustees took the following action by decisive vote:

“That for the good of the Seminary (Faculty Manual II.4.C.4) Professor Peter Enns be suspended at the close of this school year, that is May 23, 2008 (Constitution Article III, Section 15), and that the Institutional Personnel Committee (IPC) recommend the appropriate process for the Board to consider whether Professor Enns should be terminated from his employment at the Seminary. Further that the IPC present their recommendations to the Board at its meeting in May 2008.”

In order to provide the entire Westminster community with a more complete understanding of the Board’s decision and to offer an opportunity for questions and dialogue, the Chairman and Secretary of the Board will join the President on campus for a special chapel on Tuesday, April 1 at 10:30 am. Students and staff are encouraged to attend and participate. Following that special chapel, they will hold a separate meeting with the faculty.
Our concern is to honor the Lord Jesus Christ and assure a faithful witness for Westminster for years to come. To that end, please pray for everyone involved during the next two months.

Jack White
Chairman of the Board
Has anyone read the book in question?

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Did Peter write the Epistle to the Hebrews?



{Disclaimer: I've since formalized my position on this matter and I am convinced that Saint Paul wrote Hebrews (with the help of Saint Luke). However, I leave this blog post up because it shows how Saint Peter and Saint Paul were of the same mind with regard to the true deposit of Faith.}

I've been studying the epistle of 1 Peter with my students. Interestingly enough, Peter uses many phrases that are employed in Hebrews.

For example, 1 Peter and Hebrews speak of the "blood of the sprinkling" (1 Pet 1:2 & Heb 10:2; 12:24). Both 1 Peter and Hebrews describes Christ as the "Shepherd" (1 Pet 2:25 & Heb 13:20). Also the Greek word "antitype" appears only twice in the New Testament: once in 1 Peter and once in Hebrews.

This begs the question: Did Saint Peter write the Epistle to the Hebrews? Well, he was the Apostle to the Jews. Another possible author might be Silas/Silvanus, since he is responsible for crafting 1 Peter (cf. 1 Pet 5:12). The Pauline elements in Hebrews could be explained by Silas' role in Paul's missions and his role in composition of 1 & 2 Thessalonians.

I'm merely thinking out loud. I'd be grateful for criticisms.

The Covenant of Sinai and the Covenant of Moab


The book of Deuteronomy is not a second telling of the Sinai Covenant, but a different covenant altogether.

Deut 29:1 reads, "These are the words of the covnenant which the LORD commanded Moses to make with the sons of ISrael in the land of Moab, besides the covenant which He had made with them at Horeb (i.e. Sinai)."

Also, it seems that this Moab Covenant is truly "Mosaic" since it is made by Moses. Here in Deuteronomy at Moab, a divine theophany like the one that occurred at Mount Horeb/Sinai is lacking.

This would explain why Christ said, "Moses allowed you to divorce."

Monday, March 24, 2008

Why is the festival of Christ's Resurrection called Easter?


Basing their hypothesis on a passage of the Venerable St. Bede, some claim that the Anglo-Christians adopted the name Easter from the name of a pagan goddess: Eastre in Anglo-Saxon; Eostre in Northumbrian. The name comes from the proto Indo-European root "aus" meaning "to shine" and "the east" (since the sun shines from the east). She is the infamous Ashtorah of the Old Testament, the one for whom poles were erected as signs of fertility. The kingdom of Austria comes from the same root since it is the kingdom of the east or the "austra".

The Catholic Church does not formally call the feast "Easter" but rather "Pascha" - a word derived from the Aramaic word for "Passover". Only English and Germanic lands use the term related to "Easter".

Some apologist claim that Easter comes from the Anglo-Saxon word "oster", meaning "to rise". This would be a convenient etymology since it avoids the pagan connotations.

I favor a third explanation. The Anglo-Saxons called the Spring equinox "Eostre". It was a astronomical description. Since pagans ceremoniously celebrate astronomical events as holy days, the natural phenomenon (the spring equinox as a "shining") and the religious feast (the goddess of fertility and light, Ashtorah) were indistinguishable.

Anglo-Saxons didn't borrow the name of a goddess for the feast of Christ's resurrection. They simply denoted it by the name of the natural phenomenon (the spring equinox), since the festival is calculated by using marking the equinox. It just happens that the name of the goddess and the name of the feast are etymologically connected. This would confirm the exact context of Bede's words:
"Eostur-month, which is now interpreted as the paschal month, was formerly named after the goddess Eostre, and has given its name to the festival."

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Pope Baptizes famous Muslim convert at Easter Vigil


I was just on my way to the Paschal Vigil when my friend Walker Dollahon sent this along to me:
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Benedict led the world's Catholics into Easter on Saturday at a Vatican service where he baptized a Muslim-born convert who is one of Italy's most famous and controversial journalists.
Full story at Reuters by Philip Pullella.

Hat tip to my buddy Walker Dollahon.

Holy Saturday: The Son of God rests from His labors


And on the seventh day God rested from His labors and hallowed the Sabbath Day.

Christ the Son of God lay in the tomb keeping the perfect Sabbath rest with His body. And with His soul He robs Sheol of the righteous souls of elder times. All of Heaven keeps still on this Sabbath, waiting in expectation for the New Creation - the Eighth Day.

Friday, March 21, 2008

1 Clement and the corpus of Saint Paul's Epistles


It is almost universally accepted that the first epistle of Saint Clement was written in the last year of Domitian or in the first year of his successor (i.e. A.D. 95-96).

It's interesting to see which of Paul's epistles Clement cites.

Clement 2:7 cites Titus 3:1 (one of the alleged pseudepigraphical epistles of Paul). This would mean that by the 90s, Christians in Rome were already circulating the Pastoral Epistles, so that they were read and memorized.

Clement 5:2 alludes to Galatians 2:9.

Clement 34:8 alludes to 1 Cor 2:9.

Clement 36 is full of quotes from Hebrews.

Clement 44 seems to be aware of Paul's instructions in 1 Tim and Titus.

Clement 47:1-2 cites Phil 4:15 directly as "the epistle of the blessed Paul the Apostle."

Clement 61:2 alludes to 1 Tim 1:17.

From these citations, we see that Clement has Galatians, 1 Corinthians, Philippians, Hebrews, and he also likely had 2 Timothy and Titus.

This reveals that already by A.D. 96, the epistles of Paul (including Hebrew, 1 Tim, 2 Tim, and Titus) were being circulated. The Paul corpus had been brought together. 2 Peter testifies to the same.

The question remains, who brought together the corpus of Paul's work?

I believe that it was Paul himself. For example, we have the letters of Cicero not because someone knocked on the door of every person to whom Cicero sent a letter. Rather, Cicero had a copy made of every letter that he wrote and collected them. Thus, at his death, Cicero had created the collected works of Cicero simply by virtue of his keeping record of his correspondence.

We know that Paul did something similar: "When you come, bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas, also the books, and above all the parchments." (2 Tim 4:13).

Thus, when Paul died, the Pauline corpus was already assembled and ready for copying, if it were not already being copied in his own life time.

Christ has died


We adore you, O Christ, and we bless you.
By your holy cross you have redeemed the world.

Did Jesus have Brothers?

The so-called “Brothers” of Jesus
In Jewish antiquity, “brother” does not mean “blood brother” but simply “kinsman”

For example:
Gen 14:14 - Lot, Abraham’s nephew (Gen 11:26-28), described as Abraham’s brother (KJV)
Gen 29:15 - Laban, Jacob’s uncle, calls Jacob his “brother” (KJV)

The “brothers” of Jesus number are actually the children of Mary the wife of Cleophas
Mary wife of Cleophas and “sister” of the Virgin Mary (Jn 19:25) is the mother of James and Joseph (Mk 15:47; Mt 27:56) who are called the “brothers of Jesus” (Mk 6:3).

The number of the “brothers” of Jesus equals about 95 men!!!
Acts 1:12-15 says that there were 120 at Pentecost consisting of apostles (12 people), Mary (1 person), “some women” (about 12 people) and Jesus’ “brothers”—this means that the “brothers of Jesus" numbered at about 95 people!!! Obviously “brothers” does not mean blood brothers.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Pope Benedict's new (but old) Pastoral Staff


The Holy Father has broken from his immediate successors and pulled a new pastoral staff out from Vatican storage. This "new" staff was used by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII.Here's the new one:

For those interested, here is the history of the old "John Paul II Staff".

The Bible against Contraception


Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the sons of one's youth.

Happy is the man who has his quiver full of them!

He shall not be put to shame when he speaks with his enemies in the gate.
(Psalm 127:4-5)

Human fertility is a blessing
Gen 1:27-28 – be fruitful and multiply
Ex 23:25-26; Deut 7:13-14 – fertility declared a covenantal blessing
Ps 127:3-5 – children are a gift from God…blessed is a quiver full
Hos 9:10-17 – Israel punished with childlessness
1 Tim 2:11-15 – women saved through childbearing
Lev 21:20 – crushed testicles called defect/blemish
Deut 23:1 – castrated men banned from OT worship

Withholding self and seed is unnatural and sinful
Gen 38:9-10 – Onan killed by God for spilling his semen on the ground
Acts 5:1-11 – Ananias/Saphira slain for withholding part of their gift

The OT punishes sterile sex with death
Lev 20:13 – death sentence for man with man (sterile sex)
Lev 20:15 – death sentence for man with animal (sterile sex)
Lev 20:16 – death sentence for woman with animals (sterile sex)

Artificial means of contraception condemned
Gal 5:20; Rev 9:2; Rev 21:8
These three passages condemn “sorcery”. However, the Greek word used is pharmakeia, a word denoting pharmaceutical contraceptives and abortificants.

Results from 2008 Catholic Blog Awards


Well, I've got good news and bad news. The bad news is that I didn't win first in any category. The good news is that I did place is almost every category and came in second for "Best New Catholic Blog".

Congrats to creativeminorityreport.com for winning the "Best New Catholic Blog" category.

The big winner this year was clearly: What Does the Prayer Really Say? who won most the categories.

A special "thank you" to everyone who voted for Canterbury Tales. I truly appreciate it.

2nd Place in "Best New Catholic Blog"

  1. creativeminorityreport.com: 56
  2. Canturbury Tales: 41
  3. Young Fogeys: 36
  4. The Deacon's Bench: 35
  5. Arrival : The Parousian Weblog: 33
Canterbury Tales also placed in other categories:

4th Place in "Smartest Catholic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 183
  2. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 54
  3. the new liturgical movement: 53
  4. Canturbury Tales: 40

8th Place in "Best Overall Catholic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 170
  2. danielle bean: 72
  3. the new liturgical movement: 70
  4. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 67
  5. Happy Catholic: 49
  6. Charlotte was Both: 49
  7. Whispers in the loggia: 38
  8. Canturbury Tales: 37

7th Place in "Best Written Catholic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 145
  2. the new liturgical movement: 68
  3. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 55
  4. danielle bean: 45
  5. Charlotte was Both: 45
  6. the anchoress: 45
  7. Canturbury Tales: 38

6th Place in "Most Informative & Insightful Catholic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 185
  2. the new liturgical movement: 57
  3. Whispers in the loggia: 54
  4. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 47
  5. danielle bean: 40
  6. Canturbury Tales: 38

7th Place in "Best Apologetic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 160
  2. Jimmy Akin: 102
  3. Whispers in the loggia: 50
  4. Catholic and Enjoying It!: 47
  5. et tu: 44
  6. the new liturgical movement: 42
  7. Canturbury Tales: 42

7th Place in "Best Designed Catholic Blog"

  1. the new liturgical movement: 120
  2. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 97
  3. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 72
  4. danielle bean: 60
  5. creativeminorityreport.com: 41
  6. The Shrine of the holy whapping: 34
  7. Canturbury Tales: 34

6th place in "Best Individual Catholic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 154
  2. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 73
  3. danielle bean: 55
  4. Whispers in the loggia: 45
  5. the anchoress: 41
  6. Canturbury Tales: 40

6th Place in "Best Insider News Catholic Blog"

  1. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 203
  2. Whispers in the loggia: 184
  3. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 103
  4. closedcafeteria: 46
  5. the new liturgical movement: 45
  6. Canturbury Tales: 38

7th Place in "Best Political/Social Commentary Catholic Blog"

  1. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 97
  2. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 82
  3. closedcafeteria: 70
  4. the anchoress: 70
  5. Catholic and Enjoying It!: 57
  6. Whispers in the loggia: 47
  7. Canturbury Tales: 38

10th Place in "Funniest Catholic Blog"

  1. The Curt Jester: 170
  2. What Does the Prayer Really Say?: 66
  3. AmericanPapist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 66
  4. The Shrine of the holy whapping: 58
  5. The Ironic Catholic: 56
  6. danielle bean: 49
  7. creativeminorityreport.com: 39
  8. I have to sit down.: 37
  9. Alive and Young: 36
  10. Canturbury Tales: 34

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Top Ten Paradise Lost Quotes





    

Below are the Top Ten Quotes from John Milton's Paradise Lost:

Please also take a look at the following articles:

(1.)
1:254-255
The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a heav’n of hell, a hell of heav’n.
Storyline:
The great war of the angels has been settled and Satan and the other demons have been cast into hell. Satan is lamenting his loss and beginning to realize that he will be in hell for a very long time. At this point in the narrative Satan is still licking his wounds and not seriously considering revenge. Instead, he is deciding how to make the best of the situation. It is a few lines later when he utters the famous phrase “Better to reign in hell, than serve in heav’n.” (PL 1:263)
Relevance:
Satan’s existential view of damnation does little to comfort him when faced with the reality of Hell. Just as the chosen people were never able to shake the myth of happiness in Egypt, so Satan can never forget the true happiness he experienced in paradise. Even as he plots to corrupt creation he wrestles with the impossible dream of returning to heaven. He must feed his own hate with lies to make his loss more bearable. In the end the very thought of happiness becomes a source of pain for him. In the garden he states, “the more I see / Pleasures about me, so much more I feel / Torment within me…”. (PL 9:119-121) Like many people who have fallen away from the Church, the problem is not so much one of issues, but one of pride and the fear of atonement. Sometimes the only way to justify this separation is by making the accusation that the Church is not all it claims to be. As if we can devalue the truth with our minds and somehow escape the reality. Satan discovers that hell will always be hell.
(2.)
1:648-649
…who overcomes
By force, hath overcome but half his foe.
Storyline:
The self-pity of Satan doesn’t last long and revenge is soon on his mind. Before his revolt Satan had thought that it was old repute and custom (639-640) that gave God his throne and he learned too late that while God’s regal state was fully revealed, his strength was concealed. Having been self-deceived in his pride, Satan announces these lines and suggests that God too is deceiving Himself if He believes war and punishment is the final solution.
Relevance:
Fitting lines for our times. As a country we struggle with the realization that defeating a nation’s leaders or a nation’s army does not guarantee victory over its people. In the John Mayer song Belief he writes: belief is a beautiful armor/ but makes for the heaviest sword. If there is to be any real change in people it has to stem from the heart. This is the same concept that the Jews missed when they chose Barrabas, whose message was one of revenge and insurrection, over Jesus whose message was one of love, sacrifice, and conversion. It is also the reason that in times of extreme Christian persecution, the faith has flourished instead of faded.
(3.)
2:880-884
With impetuous recoil and jarring sound
Th’ infernal doors, and on their hinges grate
Harsh thunder, that the lowest bottom shook
Of Erebus. She opened, but to shut
Excelled her power; the gates wide open stood
Storyline:
Satan and his council of demons have decided that to avenge themselves Satan will travel to earth and corrupt God’s new creation. Barring his exit are the fortified gates of hell guarded by his offspring Sin and their offspring Death. Satan convinces Sin to unlock the gates by promising her a new home on earth for her and Death.
Relevance:
At first glance this seems like a simple reference to Pandora’s Box; the locked-up monsters seizing their opportunity for escape. But this is more of a metaphor for what happens when we allow sin into our lives rather than an explanation for how evil entered the world. Before the Philistines cut Samson’s hair and he lost all his strength, he had been toying with Delilah as she tried to unmask his secret. Every time he lied about the source of his strength he came just a little closer to the truth while knowing that each time Delilah would try to weaken him and turn him over to the Philistines. Yet, eventually he gave in, told the truth and was captured. This is the same thing that happens when we court sin. We expect our strength to protect us without realizing that it has been eroded away and once we say yes to sin it is almost impossible to return to a state of innocence. This is why we end the Act of Contrition with the resolution to sin no more, and to avoid the near occasion of sin. To shut the gates excels our power.
(4.)
3:129-132
The first sort by their own suggestions fell,
Self-tempted, self-depraved: man falls deceived
By the other first: man therefore shall find grace,
The other none
Storyline:
God the Father is discussing the fall of Satan with the Son and the angels. He says that all the angels were created with free will and that to have prevented their sin would have been to change their nature. The same is true for Man, but his future will be different because his sin was not from within.
Relevance:
The nature of angels has captured the fascination of everyone from St. Thomas Aquinas to people in New Age cults. While many aspects of angels have been deduced through logic and philosophy or disclosed in private revelations, there remains a sort of cloud about the whole business since very little is revealed by Sacred Scripture. One question often asked is why good angels are incapable of ever choosing evil (when they once could) and why fallen angels are eternally fallen without hope of redemption. Aquinas suggests that there was a time when angels did not share in the full beatific vision and that before they could see God in all His glory they had to make a choice, just as we will have to make a choice. Milton says that the reason the fallen angels can not be redeemed is because they chose not to serve and had no outside influences to form their decision. Were life a basketball game, interference would have been called on the devil and mankind would have gotten a penalty shot. Instead we were given a Savior.
(5.)
4:518-520
do they only stand
By ignorance, is that their happy state,
The proof of their obedience and their faith?
Storyline:
Satan has entered God’s new creation and has found it more wonderful than he imagined. With a certain amount of effort he must persuade himself to continue his mission to corrupt earth. When he sees Man and overhears God’s warning about the Tree of Life, Satan reflects on his own lost state of bliss and suggests that God uses Man’s ignorance to keep them subservient. What riles Satan is that they are rewarded for their imposed obedience with happiness and immortality.
Relevance:
This is an ironic passage because John Milton was not a Catholic. In fact, Paradise Lost contains a few lines that speak quite critically of the Church. The irony is that the question that Satan asks is the same that many people ask when challenging Papal authority. They suggest that, rather than think for themselves, Catholics blindly follow the Pope wherever he leads. But a Catholic who takes his faith seriously is informed and educated, not blind. And just as Adam and Eve were created with a nature sufficient to have stood, but free to fall (PL III:99), so the Church guides us with direction that is just and right and we are free to fall away and accept the consequences. Quite opposite to this criticism, the Church has always taught that it is our responsibility to learn the Faith and that we can be held accountable for our ignorance. Blind faith will save no one.
(6.)
9:791-792
Greedily she engorged without restraint,
And knew not eating death;
Storyline:
After hearing an impressive array of lies and flattery, Eve is convinced that the fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil will be a source of enlightenment and virtue.
Relevance:
One of the arguments Satan uses to persuade Eve into tasting the fruit is that since she is a reflection of the Maker, if she becomes enlightened it can only serve to increase the glory of God. 1 Samuel tells the story of Saul’s rise to kingship and ultimate fall from greatness. He lost his dynasty because he also fell for this lie. On the first occasion the Lord told Saul to wait for Samuel to arrive before offering a pre-battle sacrifice. Impatient when Samuel didn’t arrive on time, Saul offered the sacrifice himself. (1 Sam 13:10-14) His second mistake came after the defeat of the Amalekites. The Lord had commanded Saul to destroy the entire city, its people, animals, and its king. Rather than destroy everything, Saul spared the king and kept the finest animals. When Samuel questioned him, Saul said that he saved the animals to offer as a sacrifice to the Lord. (1 Sam 15) The unfortunate outcome of his disobedience was that God chose to establish His eternal covenant with a different family and Saul died an ignoble death. As fallen humans it is easy to justify our actions by claiming that our hearts have the best intentions and that the rules don’t really apply in this particular case. That, at least, is what certain liturgists claim. I always think of Samuel’s reply to Saul, “To obey is better than sacrifice.” (1 Sam 15:22)
(7.)
9:945-948
Not well conceived of God, who though his power
Create could repeat, yet would be loath
Us to abolish, lest the Adversary
Triumph
Storyline:
Eve has eaten the fruit and now Adam must decide whether to join her in sin or live without her. Eve was tricked into thinking that knowledge would would make her life better; more equal with Adam. (PL 9:820) Adam is not interested in knowledge, rather he is afraid of death. The thought that Eve might die is too much for him, but he reasons that God’s warning is just a bluff and that he would never kill them, lest Satan be triumphant.
Relevance:
Earlier in the story after Eve has eaten the fruit, but before she had given it to Adam, she is very troubled by what her next move should be. Eve considers not sharing the fruit with Adam because for the moment she believes she is his intellectual superior. This idea quickly fades when she remembers that the price for disobedience is death. She becomes jealous with the thought that if she dies God could create another Eve for Adam. This is interesting because right now it is Eve who is trusting God, even if it is only trust caused by fear. Adam does not share the same fear as he makes his decision. He does not fear separation from God or even death. His only fear is losing Eve. In this way he makes Eve a false idol and breaks the first commandment that God will later give to Moses. “I am the Lord your God, you shall not have false gods before me.”
(8.)
10:145, 152-153
Was she thy God,
lovely to attract
Thy love, not thy subjection
Storyline:
Adam and Eve have eaten the forbidden fruit and they are being questioned by God. As in the book of Genesis, everyone has passed the blame. Adam tells God that this woman whom He made to be his help gave him the fruit. How could such evil be expected from one so fair? God tells Adam that his fall was not Eve’s doing, but his personal choice and responsibility.
Relevance:
This is such a great passage because in the Bible God does not reply to Adam’s accusation. In Genesis, God listens to Adam and then turns to Eve (who also passes the buck). One of my favorite G. K. Chesterton quotes is, “Love is not blind, it is bound. And the more it is bound, the less it is blind.” This is also a central theme in the Theology of the Body. It was the responsibility of Adam to protect Eve and he knew this. Just minutes before Eve met the serpent, she and Adam had been arguing about whether or not they should tend the garden together since they spent more time flirting and chatting than they did working. Adam affirmed that they should stay together because the Archangel Raphael had warned them about the intruder, but he let Eve go off to pout on her own. And so in this moment when Eve was upset and Adam had let his guard down, Satan weaved his lies. Adam’s fault was his inability to say no to Eve. He let her wander off and he followed her in her sin because he had become her subject.
(9.)
12:282-283
So many and so various laws are giv’n;
So many laws argue so many sins
Storyline:
The sentence has been passed onto Man for their disobedience and they have accepted their responsibility for the Fall, but they are not left without hope. St. Michael stands with Adam and reveals the future of man from Cain and Abel and the Israelites to the Incarnation and the the Second Coming. This passage refers to the extensive laws given to the 12 tribes.
Relevance:
In the Old Testament, some of the drier parts to read are the lengthy collections of rules and regulations for the Israelite people. As Milton suggests, these laws tend to follow sharply on acts of disobedience and distrust. For example, in Numbers 12-14 first Aaron and Miriam challenge Moses’ authority, then the twelve scouts sent to reconnoiter the promised land come back and say they were too weak to enter the land, and finally the people become discouraged and threaten to march back to Egypt. It is not surprising then that in Numbers 15 there is a new set of laws for the people. This pattern is seen once again in Numbers 16 with the revolt of Dathan and Abiram followed by laws about tithing in the next chapter. Since rebellion and idolatry was a constant temptation for the Israelite people, by the time Jesus came the number of laws that had to be followed had become oppressive and the spirit of the law had generally been overlooked. It is particularly meaningful then that it was Jesus, clean from all sin, who came to reform the law.
(10.)
12:394-396
Not by destroying Satan, but his works
In thee and in thy seed; nor can this be,
But by fulfilling that which thou didst want,
Obedience to the law of God,
Storyline:
St. Michael is explaining the prophesy from Genesis 3:15 about striking the serpent’s head and he tells Adam not to expect another angelic war. The Son’s victory over Satan will come by doing what Adam and his descendants so often failed to do. Victory would come through obedience.
Relevance:
It is through Christ’s obedience and sacrifice that Satan is defeated. The disobedience of Adam and the disobedience of the Israelites is rectified when Christ submits to the Will of the Father. Satan tempts Christ in the desert in much the same way he tempts Eve in the garden. He offers convincing arguments that make the sin seem like a noble action. In the case of Jesus, Satan tempts Him to turn the rocks to food and feed the hungry, to “trust in the Lord’s protection” by leaping from the parapet and letting the angels support Him, and to make himself king over all the world. As Pope Benedict XVI points out in Jesus of Nazareth, all these things were part of the mission of the Messiah. However, the devil twists these good actions and asks Jesus to use them in selfish, self-serving ways. As soon as Jesus dismisses Satan, the Father sends angels to minister to Him and the Lord’s true protection is already manifested. Just as Milton’s lines suggest, the defeat of the Satan comes not from open war and violence, but from the grace given by obedience to the Father.
All quotes from Paradise Lost have been taken from Paradise Lost: A Norton Critical Edition 2nd Ed. edited by Scott Elledge. Unfortunately, this particular edition is out of print, but the Penguin Classics edition can be purchased here. If you’re interested in reading this book and other classics but would like some guidance, please check out the Questions for the Thinker Series.

From Aquinas and More: Top Ten Quotes from John Milton’s Paradise Lost

Top Ten Quotes from John Milton's Paradise Lost

Hat tip to Musings from a Catholic Bookstore.

Pope celebrates Mass for murdered Iraqi bishop


This is a few days old, but worth noting:

Vatican, Mar. 17, 2008 (CWNews.com) - Pope Benedict XVI (bio - news) celebrated Mass for the soul of Iraqi Archbishop Paulos Faraj Raho on March 17, and added his prayers that the people of Iraq "may find the strength not to lose heart."

During the Mass, celebrated in the Redemptoris Mater chapel of the apostolic palace, the Holy Father said that the events of Holy Week show a sharp "contrast between truth and lies, between the mildness and rectitude of Christ and the violence and dishonesty of His enemies." That same contrast, he said, can be seen in the life and death of the Chaldean archbishop.

Full text from CWN.

Responding to a comment from the "Catholic Challenge to Protestants" regarding Rome and Proof-Texting

Jack recently responded the "Catholic Challenge to Protestants". It's a pretty interesting comment so I quote it below with my responses. His comment is in bold with my responses afterward, marked "TRJM".
I only really read your post, Taylor, and not much of the comments. Just several points and a few questions. First, Do you (or does anyone) really read Esther (or 3 John)? Be honest.
TRJM: Actually, I read 3 John in a Bible study two weeks ago. I’m not making this up. I truly did.
Let's say they were removed from the Bible, what would that change in the Christian lives of a whole lot of people? I suggest nothing at all. This is a rhetorical move designed to unsettle the more historically illiterate and unaware in the Christian community. Second, you mention the Shepherd of Hermas. This book is in the canon of the Ethiopian Church.
TRJM: The Ethiopian Church has made an error in this matter.
3 John was not in the Canon of the Syriac-speaking Churches.
TRJM: The Syriac Churches made an error in this matter.
These churches are ancient and apostolic.
TRJM: Yes, but that doesn't make them infallible.
They do not owe their foundation to Rome and in the case of the Syrian Churches, they are older than Rome.
TRM: Age of an apostolic See does not establish its authority. Otherwise, Jerusalem would be the clear “winner”.
I remind you that Peter was in Antioch before he was in Rome and that they were first called Christians in Rome.
TRJM: Peter was in Jerusalem before he was in Antioch. It doesn’t matter where Peter began. It matters where he came to an end – Rome. Rome and Rome alone is the Petrine See because it alone is sealed with his blood.
The proof-texting of Peter that you have engaged in elsewhere on this blog is utterly unconvincing, but if one does want to believe it, these things provide at least as much evidence for Antiochene priority as they do for Roman priority.
TRJM: No, actually it is proof from Jerusalem priority, if you want to be consistent.
For one, we do at least have biblical evidence that Peter was in Antioch. You cannot say the same for Rome.
TRJM: Peter was in Babylon, i.e. Rome. If you’ll allow me to proof-text, see 1 Peter 5:13.
Third, it goes without saying, but I'll say it here that the Bible is written in Hebrew and Greek (and some Aramaic). It was written by people who came from the Middle East and the Eastern Empire. It was not produced by the church of Rome. It was the east that produced Rome and not vice-versa.
TRJM: Yes, but the canon was finally canonized by Rome. Council of Rome. Pope Damasus I. 382 A.D.
To a student of the early church and a student of the eastern church, these sorts of arguments and claims of precedence seem embarrassingly solipsistic.
TRJM: The Catholic Church at one billion plus hardly seems solipsistic. The theological "solipsism" pertains to the tiny denominations of America that posture as “Reformed”.
Look at who wrote the foundational creeds of Roman Catholicism and where they were written. It was not in the West, not in Rome. It was in the East. They were written by Easterners.
TRJM: That’s because the East was plagued with heresy at this time.
Fourth and related to my first point: if NT in the entire world were destroyed we would be in the exact same situation...as the NT church.
TRJM: And that would be a bad thing since we don't have any Apostles teaching among us. We would not be in the situation of the NT church.
Did the hearers of Peter's sermon on Pentecost have 3rd John? Did the Church at Rome have 3rd John? Did they have any NT books? Were these people Christians? Today, there are people all over the world who are Christians who do not have a complete NT in their own language, or even a NT. They are followers of Jesus nevertheless.
TRJM: Are you saying that God inspired 3 John but we don’t really need it, because we are all “followers of Jesus nevertheless”? Moreover, the folks listening to Peter had Peter in their midst. We don't have that blessing. Instead, we have the apostolic memoirs - the Sacred Scriptures.
This whole line of questioning is a complete red-herring and the infallible/inerrant fetishism which lies behind these sorts of questions (and similar questions about whether the church is infallible or whether the bible is infallible or inerrant) reflects a vision of the Christian faith which is ultimately as immature as it is intellectually unsatisfying.
TRJM: Jack, you just insulted over 3/4ths of the world's Christians, including the Orthodox. You use the East for your arguments and then insult them.

Jack, to which denomination to you belong?

Does N.T. Wright lead to the Catholic Church?

I started reading N.T. Wright at Westminster Seminary and along the way through my hiatus as an Anglican. I think that he provided the necessary paradigm shift for me to appreciate nuances of the Council of Trent regarding justification.

NT Wright is a good enough biblical theologian to realize that Paul wasn't teaching individual salvation by way of an imputation of an alien righteousness. That's why he's received so much attention.

Some earnest Protestants are now scratching their heads and saying to themselves: "You know, everything we've always assumed that Paul taught isn't actually articulated by Paul. Maybe it's time to rethink the entire systematic theology that we (Protestants) erected in the 16th-17th century."

If you buy into Wright's covenantal realism, you've already taken three steps toward the Catholic Church.

It's almost as if Wright dug deeply into Paul's writings until finally he came to a door. When he opened the door, to everyone's surprise, he found that he was standing in the Council of Trent!

Click here to here for the Canons of the Council of Trent on Justification (i.e. the Sixth Session).

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Peter and the Origin of the Papacy


An investigation of the New Testament reveals that Peter is not just another apostle. Nor is he merely prima inter pares - first among equals. Rather, he seems to be deeply conformed to the work and mission of Christ. He is, as we would say, the vicar of Christ.

Peter’s name is mentioned 195 times in the New Testament – more than all the other Apostles combined.
Mt 16:18 – on this rock (Peter) I will build my Church
Mt 16:19 – I will give you the keys of the kingdom…whatever you bind on earth is bound in heaven
Lk 22:32 – Peter’s faith will strengthen his brethren
Lk 24:34 – Peter is first apostle to see resurrected Christ
Jn 21:17 – Peter is Christ’s chief shepherd who “feeds the sheep”
Mk 16:7 – angel sent to announce resurrection to Peter
Acts 1:13-26 – Peter oversees election of Matthias
Acts 2:14 – Peter preaches first apostolic sermon
Acts 3:6-7 – Peter performs first apostolic miracle
Acts 8:21 – Peter excommunicates first heretic
Acts 10:44-46 – Peter baptizes first Gentile
Acts 15:7 – Peter presides over first apostolic council
Acts 15:19 – Peter pronounces first apostolic dogma
Gal 1:18 – Paul visits Peter after his conversion

New Five Dollar Bill - Purple with envy just doesn't sound right


That's right. The new five dollar bill is purple. I have something in common with the five dollar bill: we were both created in Fort Worth. But I can't say that the new purple version looks quite right. What do you think?

Why the Deuterocanonical books are Scriptural

The seven deuterocanonical books are: Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (aka Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees. Catholics also have longer versions of Esther and Daniel.

The Council of Rome in AD 382 formally canonized these seven “deuterocanonical” books along with the rest of the OT and NT as we know it.

Martin Luther removed these seven books from the OT because first century Rabbinical Jews had previously rejected them. Protestants call them the “Apocrypha” meaning “hidden” books. First century Jews who denied that Jesus was the Messiah rejected these seven books because of their emphasis on the Messiah and the resurrection.

However, the New Testament actually refers to the seven “extra” deuterocanonical books, which means that the NT authors approved of these seven books. For example:

o Heb 11:35 refers to 2 Mac 6:18-7:42
o 1 Pet 1:6-7 refers to Wisdom 3:5-6
o Rom 1:18-32 refers to Wisdom 13:1-9

The Greek version of the OT called the “Septuagint” contained the deuterocanonicals and the Septuagint is frequently quoted by the NT authors: Is 7:14 - Mt 1:23; Is 40:3 - Mt 3:3; Joel 2:30-31 - Acts 2:19-29; Ps 95:7-9 - Heb 3:7-9.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

What does the inscription I.N.R.I. mean over the head of Christ crucified?


The Romans sometimes forced their victims to wear a titulum when convicted of a crime. The titulum or "title" brought shame to the criminal as it announced to the public his crime. This titulum could then be affixed to the victim's crucifix as a warning to other would-be criminals.

The Gospels record that Pontius Pilate issued Jesus a rather sarcastic titulum reading "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews" in three languages: Latin, Greek, and Hebrew (likely Aramaic).

The priests objected to the titulum and asked that it be rewritten to read: "This man claimed to be the King of the Jews" but Pilate answered, "I have written what I have written." (Jn 19:22)

Perhaps Pilate wished to send a message to the Jewish population that anyone else claiming regency in Judea was likewise be crucified.

The "I.R.N.I." is an artistic rendering of the title in Latin: Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum ("Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews").

Why did Jesus enter Jerusalem on a donkey on Palm Sunday?


Prior to entering Jerusalem, Christ instructed his disciples to acquire for him a donkey (in Matthew's Gospel and donkey and a colt).

Why is this?

The prophet Zechariah wrote: "Behold, your king comes to you, triumphant and victorious. He is humble and riding on an ass, on a colt the foal of an ass." (Zech 9:9)

The messianic sign was at once perceived by the crowds who hailed Jesus as their king shouting, "Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!" (Mt 21:9) Catholics still shout this Davidic salutation every time the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is celebrated. It is an acknowledgment that Jesus is the true Davidic Messiah and king.

Sunday, March 09, 2008

What the Bible says about celibacy

Jer 16:1-4 – God commands Jeremiah to be celibate
Mt 19:12 – celibacy commended by Christ
1 Cor 7:7-9 – Paul was celibate
1 Cor 7:32-33 – celibacy commended by Paul
1 Tim 5:9-12 – pledge of celibacy taken by widows

Friday, March 07, 2008

I'll be speaking tonight at St. Mary the Virgin in Arlington, Texas


For those in the Dallas-Fort Worth area who are interested, I'll be speaking at the Lenten Friday event at St. Mary the Virgin Catholic Church (Anglican Use) on Friday March 6 at 6:30pm.

Come for Stations of the Cross, a talk, and Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.

St Mary the Virgin Catholic Church
1408 North Davis Drive
Arlington, Texas 76012

I hope to see you there!

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Cardinal Newman on the path to sainthood?


This is great:
The Venerable John Henry Cardinal Newman, 1801-1890, the best-known English churchman of the 19th century, may be beatified later this year according to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints in Rome.

Last month Cardinal José Saraiva Martins said that he hoped that the beatification of Cardinal Newman, founder of the English Congregation of the Oratory of St Philip Neri, would happen this year.

Fr Paul Chavasse, the Provost of the Birmingham Oratory in Edgbaston, where Newman spent much of his Catholic life, said: “We are much encouraged that Cardinal Martins has indicated that the beatification of our founder Cardinal Newman might take place later this year.”
Full text from the Times.

Abortion and the Bible

Life begins at conception
Job 31:15 God made you in the womb…formed us in our mothers
Ps 22:9-10 “from my mother’s womb you have been my God”
Ps 139:13-16 “you knit me together in my mother’s womb…your eyes saw my unformed body”
Is 44:2; Is 49:5 the Lord formed you in the womb
Is 46:3-4 “I have upheld you since you were conceived”
Jer 1:4-5 “before you were born I set you apart”
Lk 1:41 “the baby lept in her womb”

We should be involved in pro-life causes
Ex 20:13 Thou shalt not murder
Ps 82:3-4 defend the weak and fatherless
Prov 24:11-12 rescue those being led away to death

Pharmaceutical abortion condemned
Gal 5:2; Rev 9:2; Rev 21:8
These three passages condemn “sorcery”. However, the Greek word used is pharmakeia, a word denoting harmful pharmaceutical contraceptives and abortificants.

Abraham's Binding of Isaac or the Akedah


I wrote a previous post on the age of Isaac when Abraham took him up on Mount Moriah for sacrifice. In this second post, we take a look at the meaning of this sacrifice.

The binding of Isaac in Gen 22 is referred to as the עקדה or "Akedah" meaning "binding".

In the Christian tradition, Isaac is clearly a type of Christ. He willingly offers himself in obedience to the Father as a sacrifice. By carrying the wood for the sacrifice on his back, Isaac prefigures Christ who carried the cross to his own immolation. Abraham receives Isaac back as one who was as good as dead. There is a kind of resurrection in the story. This becomes even more interesting when we examine Jewish tradition on the matter:
It appears that this notion was widespread in medieval times: Ibn Ezra (commentary on Gen. 22:19) also quotes an opinion that Abraham actually did kill Isaac...and he was later resurrected from the dead. Ibn Ezra rejects this as completely contrary to the biblical text. Shalom Spiegel has demonstrated, however, that such views enjoyed a wide circulation and occasionally found expression in medieval writings.

-Louis Jacobs, "Akedah," Encyclopedia Judaica 2:482.
Obviously the belief that Abraham did in fact slay his son is an error. Nevertheless, it demonstrates how the sacrifice of Isaac was so closely identified with death and resurrection.

As noted previously, Gen 22:14 reveals that the Akedah occurred on "the mount of the LORD". It is Mount Moriah - the location of the future Temple mount of Jerusalem. (cf. 2 Chron 3:1). It would seem that sacrifice of animals on Mount Moriah at the Temple recalls the original "sacrifice" of Abraham at the Akedah of Isaac. In other words, animal sacrifices recall the human sacrifice of obedience. Clearly, once the Messiah offers his life in sacrifice, animal sacrifices serve no purpose.

Baptismal Regeneration in Scripture


Jn 3:5 – born of water and spirit
Acts 2:37-38 – be baptized and receive Holy Spirit
Acts 22:16 – be baptized and wash away your sins
Rom 6:4-46 – baptized into death, live in newness of life
1 Cor 6:11 – you were washed, sanctified, justified
Titus 3:5 – the “washing of regeneration”

It is worth noting that "regeneration" passages are almost always in the context of baptism, water, or washing.

I'll be speaking at St. Mary the Virgin in Arlington, Texas on March 7


For those in the Dallas-Fort Worth area who are interested, I'll be speaking at the Lenten Friday event at St. Mary the Virgin Catholic Church (Anglican Use) on Friday March 6 at 6:30pm.

Come for Stations of the Cross, a talk, and Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.

St Mary the Virgin Catholic Church
1408 North Davis Drive
Arlington, Texas 76012

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Chaldean Catholic Bishop Kidnapped by Iraqis

From CWNews.com:

Mosul, Feb. 29, 2008 - The Chaldean Catholic Bishop of Mosul, Iraq, has been abducted, the AsiaNews service reports.

Bishop Paulos Faraj Raho was seized by terrorists who attacked his car as he left the Holy Spirit cathedral in Mosul after leading the Stations of the Cross on Friday, February 29. Three companions who had been in the car with him were killed.

A Church spokesman in Iraq confirmed that the bishop was in the custody of his kidnappers, who had contacted the Chaldean Church to make a ransom demand. Iraqi Catholics did not know whether or not the bishop had been wounded in the attack.

Saturday, March 01, 2008

Substantiating the Weekly Sunday Eucharist


There are some helpful comments under the previous post about the historicity of the weekly Eucharist. The Didache has been brought forward, as well as the testimony of St. Justin Martyr. Both clearly state that the weekly Sunday gathering of Christians incorporated the Sacrament of Christ's Body and Blood.

But I'd like to go back even further. The Acts of the Apostles tells us that the Apostles celebrated the Eucharist daily.
"And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they partook of food with glad and generous hearts." (Acts 2:46)
Even so, one can find evidence for the communal Sunday Eucharist in Acts 20:7,
"On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them."
Here, "breaking bread" is not "have lunch together" but is a liturgical, communal event. It takes place on the "first day of the week", i.e. Sunday.
Subscribe to feed
Related Posts with Thumbnails

This blog, Canterbury Tales, is solemnly consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

“Et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius
ut revelentur ex multis cordibus cogitationes.”
(Luke 2:35, Vulgate)
Our Lady, Seat of Wisdom, pray for us.
#navbar-iframe { height:0px; visibility:hidden; display:none; }